National

Loya death: SC says attempts to scandalise judiciary, dismisses pleas

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed pleas seeking an independent probe into the death of special CBI judge B H Loya, ruling that the judge died of natural causes and the petitions were a serious attempt to scandalise and obstruct the course of justice

The apex court also held that all litigations concerning circumstances of death of judge Loya is concluded with this judgement

The top court dubbed the PILs into the death of judge Loya who was hearing the high-profile Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case, as frivolous and motivated litigations to settle political scores and rivalry were behind the "facade of the PIL" to malign the dignity of judicial officers and Bombay High Court judges

Loya had died of cardiac arrest in Nagpur on December 1, 2014 when he had gone to attend the wedding of a colleague's daughter

The top court said the judicial process will be reduced to a "charade" if the courts are burdened with such cases with extraneous reasons

A bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud said there was no reason to doubt the statements of four judges on the circumstances leading to Loya's death and the documents placed on record and their scrutiny established that the death was due to natural cause

The top court, which was critical of the petitioners and their lawyers for casting insinuations against the judicial officers and judges, said an attempt was made to cause prejudice against them and was a "vituperative assault on the judiciary." 

It said that with these petitions it becomes clear that "a real attempt and frontal attack" was made on the independence of judiciary and the present case was a manifestation to carry forward a personal agenda

The petitioners had launched a veiled attempt to malign the judiciary and the credibility of judicial institutions was questioned, the three-judge bench said and criticised the attempts by senior advocates and activist lawyers Dushyant Dave, Indira Jaising and Prashant Bhushan to make insinuations against judges, including that of the apex court

"Business rivalries have to be resolved in the market and political rivalries in the grand hall of democracy. It is the court's duty to protect the law," Justice Chandrachud, pronouncing the verdict for the bench, said

It also took serious note of Bhushan's plea that two of its judges, Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud, should recuse themselves from hearing the matter as they came from Maharashtra and must be knowing all judges of the Bombay High Court concerned with case. -PTI

1 dead in Noida building collapse

Noida : One person was dead and three injured in another under-construction building collapse in Noida on Saturday. The incident occurred in Sector 63...

BJP creating Talibanis among people: Mamata Banerjee

Kolkata  : Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Saturday launched a scathing attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi government over rampant m...

Mumbaikars bear brunt of transport unions strike

Mumbai : As the transport unions' indefinite strike entered the second day on Saturday, the day-to-day routine of Mumbai residents has come to standst...

No-Confidence Motion was majority vs morality: Andhra CM

New Delhi : Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu on Saturday said that the No-Confidence Motion in the Lok Sabha was a case of "majority ...